The European Union has taken significant regulatory action against two major technology companies, imposing substantial fines for violations of its digital competition framework.
Apple received a €500 million ($571 million) penalty, while Meta faces a €200 million ($228.4 million) fine for separate infractions of the European digital competition regulations.
Apple’s “Anti-Steering” Violations
European officials determined that Apple failed to comply with “anti-steering” requirements mandated by the DMA. These provisions require Apple to permit app developers to freely inform customers about alternative purchasing options outside the App Store ecosystem.
As part of the ruling, regulators ordered the iPhone maker to remove both technical and commercial restrictions on steering practices and cease all non-compliant behaviors moving forward.
Apple expressed intentions to appeal the decision while maintaining dialogue with Commission officials:
“Today’s announcements are yet another example of the European Commission unfairly targeting Apple in a series of decisions that are bad for the privacy and security of our users, bad for products, and force us to give away our technology for free,” Apple said in a statement.
“We have spent hundreds of thousands of engineering hours and made dozens of changes to comply with this law, none of which our users have asked for. Despite countless meetings, the Commission continues to move the goal posts every step of the way,” the company added.
Meta’s Data Sharing Requirements
In Meta’s case, the Commission determined that the social media conglomerate illegally required users to either consent to data sharing or pay for an ad-free service. This finding relates to Meta’s introduction of a paid subscription tier for Facebook and Instagram implemented in November 2023.
Joel Kaplan, Meta’s chief global affairs officer, responded critically to the decision:
“This isn’t just about a fine; the Commission forcing us to change our business model effectively imposes a multi-billion-dollar tariff on Meta while requiring us to offer an inferior service. And by unfairly restricting personalized advertising the European Commission is also hurting European businesses and economies,” Kaplan said.
He further claimed the Commission was “attempting to handicap successful American businesses while allowing Chinese and European companies to operate under different standards.”
Regulatory Path Forward
The Commission acknowledged Meta’s efforts toward compliance through a new version of its free personalized ads service that utilizes less personal data for advertising purposes.
“The Commission is currently assessing this new option and continues its dialogue with Meta, requesting the company to provide evidence of the impact that this new ads model has in practice,” regulators stated.
According to an anonymous source familiar with the proceedings, Meta received a cease-and-desist order requiring changes to its less personalized ads option within 60 days to avoid additional penalties.
Potential US-EU Trade Implications
This regulatory action occurs amid escalating trade tensions between the European Union and the United States. The decision risks potential retaliation from US President Donald Trump, who has openly expressed dissatisfaction with European regulatory enforcement against American technology companies.
Earlier in April, the Trump administration implemented “reciprocal” tariffs of 20% on European goods entering American markets, though these rates were subsequently reduced to 10% temporarily to facilitate trade negotiations.
The initial tariffs followed Trump’s directive threatening punitive measures against Europe to combat what he described as “overseas extortion” of American tech companies through digital services taxes, fines, and regulatory policies.